01 January 2016
Winter Warmth
It's that time of year again.
Last year this time we'd already gone through a cord and a half of wood leaving me worried if we'd have enough to make it through winter.
This year, we've gone through, maybe, a quarter of a cord. Of course, this doesn't mean all is hunky dory, heatingwise.
We can hope
Cookies notification in European Union countries
For What It's Worth ~ I don't use cookies on my blog. Blogger and Google, as the owners of Blogger (and the host for Will Brady's Journal / Short Notes) DO make use of cookies, though I am not privy to their operational characteristics.
That said, European Union (EU) laws require me to give EU visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require me to obtain consent.
As a courtesy, Blogger and Google have added a notice on the blog to help meet these regulations. The notice lets visitors know about Google's use of certain Blogger and Google cookies on the blog, including Google Analytics and AdSense cookies.
Learn about Google’s privacy practices and how Google uses data on partner sites.
Googles says that if I have edited your blog in a way that hides this notice, then I am responsible to notify visitors about cookies used on this blog and if necessary, obtain consent.
If, in the future, I have added other blog features that set cookies, including third-party analytics or advertising services, I will need to provide additional or a different notice.
It is your responsibility to determine, based on your cookie use, what else would be appropriate. If you choose to use a different notice, be sure you still comply with Google’s EU user consent policy. Learn more on generating cookie notices.
Labels:
Blogger,
Eu cookies requirements,
Google,
notices
Other Voices ~ Bill P
"I believe a long time ago that God got hurt; that is why people got hurt"
BillP
BillP
IMAGE CREDITS: William Blake - "Ancient of Days"
deceptions - discover the spy in your midst
How to Spot an Infiltrator. Posted on Davey D's Hip Hop Corner.
[initially posted here on 8th December 2010]
1- They bring confusion and chaos with them. Every time they come around, it’s drama.
2- They keep discussions and productivity at a stalemate. They’d rather keep debating than engaging the community you’re supposed to serve.
3- They focus on impertinent theoretical points of contention as serious sources of conflict. It’s never about the people or the work. It’s always about some ideas, structures, philosophy, or abstract concept.
4- They create/increase tribalism and intensify pre-existing organizational dissatisfaction.
5- They don’t have reputable sources or references for where they come from.
6- Many have short bursts of vigorous activity, not long histories of continuous (documented/verifiable) growth and development. They come in, make a mess, then disappear.
7- Others claim long histories, even claiming “birthrights” of some sort, as a means to establish authority. Yet these claims rarely hold up under further investigation.
8- They have ambiguous sources of income.
9- They came from prison or worked in the military or law enforcement in the past (or the present, if u dig deep enough). They may be working in exchange for reduced time/plea agreement/special assignment.
10- They turn around all questions about them into attacks on the questioner. They create scapegoats, red herrings, and target people who may be onto them.
11- They build alliances with weak-minded dissatisfied people through shared vices, financial generosity, or a sense of solidarity.
12- They also “give” as a means of establishing authority and legitimacy.
13- These people don’t tend to be primary sources either.
14- They act like zealots but aren’t zealous about social change.
15- They want power and control, but demonstrate no ability to use this power or control for the good of others.
16- They are masters of manipulation, but never teach others how to manipulate the system.
[initially posted here on 8th December 2010]
1- They bring confusion and chaos with them. Every time they come around, it’s drama.
2- They keep discussions and productivity at a stalemate. They’d rather keep debating than engaging the community you’re supposed to serve.
3- They focus on impertinent theoretical points of contention as serious sources of conflict. It’s never about the people or the work. It’s always about some ideas, structures, philosophy, or abstract concept.
4- They create/increase tribalism and intensify pre-existing organizational dissatisfaction.
5- They don’t have reputable sources or references for where they come from.
6- Many have short bursts of vigorous activity, not long histories of continuous (documented/verifiable) growth and development. They come in, make a mess, then disappear.
7- Others claim long histories, even claiming “birthrights” of some sort, as a means to establish authority. Yet these claims rarely hold up under further investigation.
8- They have ambiguous sources of income.
9- They came from prison or worked in the military or law enforcement in the past (or the present, if u dig deep enough). They may be working in exchange for reduced time/plea agreement/special assignment.
10- They turn around all questions about them into attacks on the questioner. They create scapegoats, red herrings, and target people who may be onto them.
11- They build alliances with weak-minded dissatisfied people through shared vices, financial generosity, or a sense of solidarity.
12- They also “give” as a means of establishing authority and legitimacy.
13- These people don’t tend to be primary sources either.
14- They act like zealots but aren’t zealous about social change.
15- They want power and control, but demonstrate no ability to use this power or control for the good of others.
16- They are masters of manipulation, but never teach others how to manipulate the system.
IMAGE SOURCE: Still photo from the film The Molly McGuires. Found on the MUBI, an online cinema website.
Deception and fear mongering by provocateurs among the working poor has a long history. The Molly MacGuires were a part of that history.
The Molly Maguires were members of a secret organization. Many historians believe the "Mollies" were present in the anthracite coal fields of Pennsylvania in the United States from approximately the time of the American Civil War until a series of sensational arrests and trials in the years 1876−1878. Evidence that the Molly Maguires were responsible for coalfield crimes, and kidnapping in the U.S. rests largely upon allegations of one powerful industrialist, and the testimony of one Pinkerton detective. Fellow prisoners also testified against the alleged Molly MacGuires, but some believe these witnesses may have been coerced or bribed.
It is entirely possible that the leaders of the Molly McGuires were agent provocateurs paid by coal company industrialists to create terror and confusion; providing the coal company owners an excuse to attack hard working miners who were trying to organize into unions to get fair wages, safer working conditions and freedom from oppression and isolation forced upon them by the mining companies.
Deception and fear mongering by provocateurs among the working poor has a long history. The Molly MacGuires were a part of that history.
The Molly Maguires were members of a secret organization. Many historians believe the "Mollies" were present in the anthracite coal fields of Pennsylvania in the United States from approximately the time of the American Civil War until a series of sensational arrests and trials in the years 1876−1878. Evidence that the Molly Maguires were responsible for coalfield crimes, and kidnapping in the U.S. rests largely upon allegations of one powerful industrialist, and the testimony of one Pinkerton detective. Fellow prisoners also testified against the alleged Molly MacGuires, but some believe these witnesses may have been coerced or bribed.
It is entirely possible that the leaders of the Molly McGuires were agent provocateurs paid by coal company industrialists to create terror and confusion; providing the coal company owners an excuse to attack hard working miners who were trying to organize into unions to get fair wages, safer working conditions and freedom from oppression and isolation forced upon them by the mining companies.
Labels:
deception,
infiltrators,
spies,
Tea Party,
traitors
Electroshock Protest
A reading of the Reclassification document published by the US Food and Drug Administration
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/talkwithtenney/2015/12/29/talk-with-tenney-special-reading-of-shock-fda-reclassification-document
Here's a direct link to the FDA's document: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-12-29/pdf/2015-32592.pdf
About Journal Keeping # 2
Last
Summer I was posed a series of questions about Journal Keeping. My
response was quite long. Therefore, I shall break the questions up into
separate posts over the next several days.
What physical form does
your journal take? Spiral-bound, cahier, oilcloth sketchbook, Moleskin, etc.?
What materials do you use to fill it? Pen, pencil, charcoal, paint, collage, etc.?
My
preference is a hard-bound notebook with a black cover. This is what I was
first introduced to in 1980. I like to be able to use both sides of the page.
I am not concerned about the manufacturer of the book (e.g. “moleskin”) but I
like to be able to use both sides of the page, prefer unlined pages, acid
free paper with a paper weight of at least 60 lbs. My favorite sized book is
5-1/2 x 8-1/2 (14x21 cm) though I have used soft cover sketchbooks and one or
two spiral bound books of various sizes. The size noted, however, is easy to
carry with me almost all the time without drawing a lot of attention to it.
With rare exception, I have written in the
journals with a Pilot Precise “V” Series pen. It is close to a mechanical pen
in construction, and over time I have found the ink is of a low acid content
and doesn’t bleed through the pages.
I
have also sketched in the journals pasted in items as keepsakes and made an
occasional collage.
Watercolor
(using a “dry brush technique) and pen/ink sketches. I don’t use pastel, soft
pencil or charcoal because I am concerned about it smearing on the pages.
I’ve made collage pages, and inserted
photographs.
Many times (not always) I have affixed
things on to the covers of the notebooks. Once I did a collage that
encompassed both covers. Often, with the smaller books, the intent is to make
distinct one volume from others, or to easily discern front from back.
|
Bach in the Japanese Woods
Bach in the Japanese Woods
From Krista Tippett, who narrates the public radio show "On Being"
comes the links for this video.
Initially an advert for a wood covered Smartphone, the piece is stand alone excellent
From Krista Tippett, who narrates the public radio show "On Being"
comes the links for this video.
Initially an advert for a wood covered Smartphone, the piece is stand alone excellent
Darth Vader after Ayahausca
Found on a Facebook page belonging to a guy by the name of Danny Carter
Carter is also letting people know of a film maker, Dean Jeffreys, who is working on a documentary of Ayahauska Shamans and who is looking for help financing this new film “The God Molecule and the Shamanic Toad" http://migaloo2.com/thegodmolecule
Carter is also letting people know of a film maker, Dean Jeffreys, who is working on a documentary of Ayahauska Shamans and who is looking for help financing this new film “The God Molecule and the Shamanic Toad" http://migaloo2.com/thegodmolecule
Electric Crossbow
Self Cocking Electric Crossbow - As seen on You Tube
Donald Duckman designed and made this as his Arthritis worsened.
It addresses some of the arthritis problems in the hope he can keep shooting as a normal bow is to difficult now.
Have a look at the newer Hi Def version called 'Self Cocking Bow Quantity over Quality'
For details of this and other crossbows on Donald's website:- http://duckman.webplus.net/x_bows.html
Donald Duckman designed and made this as his Arthritis worsened.
It addresses some of the arthritis problems in the hope he can keep shooting as a normal bow is to difficult now.
Have a look at the newer Hi Def version called 'Self Cocking Bow Quantity over Quality'
For details of this and other crossbows on Donald's website:- http://duckman.webplus.net/x_bows.html
Wadhams, NY Memory Painting
Back in the mid 1980s I painted a "Memory" picture of the Wadhams, NY area. It included a farmstead and some of the Adirondack foothills.
Anyway, here is a photo of the painting. Painted in oil on canvas boards, I squeezed it into a heavy wood packing crate, causing a curving of the images and a simple attempt to play on depth.
I sure miss this part of the world. Someday, perhaps, I may be able to return to live there, even if only part of the year.
Labels:
Adirondacks,
oil painting,
Wadhams NY,
will brady
About Journal Keeping
Last Summer I was posed a series of questions about Journal Keeping. My response was quite long. Therefore, I shall break the questions up into separate posts over the next several days.
QUESTION 1: What do you call the form of self-documentation you keep—a journal, a diary, a notebook, a sketchbook, a scrapbook, etc.? (I use the general term “journal” in the questions that follow, but you should respond with whatever word applies to you.) Is this choice of terminology important to you?
There
are a few ways I do self-documenting.
-
By and large I use the term “journal”.I have never thought of my writing as a “diary.” I don’t keep particularly personal recounts, although on occasion, I do describe things that took place with and/or around me.
- Similarly, calling what I do a “log” seemed inapt. I used to maintain logs for a work site and the content expected of a log is quite dissimilar from a journal. The journal I keep does not provide a cohesive, chronological account of events or activities that have transpired and which I have observed.
(1) Personal journals I’ve maintained these since
1980. The physical journals are, in part, (a) writing my thoughts of personal issues,
family matters, events going on in the world; (b) rough drafts of poems, essays
and the like; (c) for note taking (recollection of info such as names and phone
#s, meeting notes, lists); (d) sketching; (e) pasting in business cards, photos
and memorabilia (concert tickets, for example)
(2) Work
journals:
Exclusively about things related to my employment as a human rights advocate in
locked settings. These are more notebooks than journal. Details of meetings
with or on behalf of clients; follow-up notes; drafts for hearing testimony;
interview statements. A good amount, but not all, of what was written here
become the start points of reports. They are all in composition books. I have
been maintaining them since 1993.
(3) Online
journaling. Long
before the term “blog” existed (since 1993 or 1994) I began to maintain an
online journal or web log, beginning on Prodigy. The content of those early weblogs
are gone. In one case a server went out of business and everything I had
documented disappeared when their computers shut off. I continue online
journaling in a mostly irregular basis on a Blogger account (that would be this one).
(4) Facebook. I have been writing and posting
on a Facebook page for several years. Most of it is not personal; rather more
reflections on subjects and other things that interest, intrigue, pique or
perturb me. …along with liked memes and cat anecdotes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)